How to Recognize and Work with Modern Data in eDiscovery

August 9, 2024

By:

Daniel Black
Daniel Black

Get the latest insights

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

New technology leads to new sources and forms of data. This leads to new questions about how to preserve, collect, process, review and produce it during litigation.

In eDiscovery circles, we call this data “modern data.”

Today, questions about modern data are focused on AI. But innovation is cyclical. A few years from now, another technology breakthrough is going to raise the same questions all over again.

Since new iterations of modern data are always around the corner, it pays for legal professionals to prepare by developing new skills and habits.

Namely, you need to learn how to recognize modern data, so you can be sure to handle it with care.

In this post, we’ll help you do that by:

  • Summarizing key aspects of modern data.
  • Providing a checklist for you to assess the data types and sources you work with today—and in the future.

What “modern” means: aspects of modern data for eDiscovery

Modern data differs from traditional data types in many ways, but three aspects are most significant in eDiscovery.

Modern means new data types

Remember how disruptive Slack and Teams were when they first arrived on the scene? No one had ever used short-form message threads as evidence before. Attachments and links within those messages only complicated it further.

It was challenging because these platforms introduced new and different data types. That’s one of the easiest ways to recognize modern data: Does it manifest in a file or other artifact that you’ve dealt with before? Or is it unique and unusual?

Modern means it has little or no legal precedent

With traditional data, you can determine how to process and produce it based on existing case law.

With modern data, those precedents are still being set. Sometimes cases involving a new technology haven’t reached the courts yet. But often you may find some rulings on record, however they’re inconsistent, so the guidance isn’t clear. It can take multiple cases, over months or possibly years, for courts and litigants to establish consensus and clarity around modern data.

In a recent post, I did a deep dive on legal precedents for modern data, including examples of case law regarding modern attachments and data retention.

Modern means eDiscovery technology hasn’t caught up yet

Emails, attachments, Slack messages, Office documents—these fall right in the wheelhouse of many eDiscovery solutions.

AI queries and responses—not so much.

If your eDiscovery solutions and workflows aren’t primed to handle a data type cleanly and reliably, that’s a clue you may be dealing with modern data.

Checklist for evaluating your data

Those three aspects give you a general idea of what makes modern data modern.

But when you’re evaluating data and technology for an actual case, it helps to get more granular.

Use the checklist below to help you assess your current data and sources. The more boxes you check, the more “modern” your data is. Take special consideration when collecting, processing, and reviewing it.

1. Data creation:

  [ ] Is the data created in cloud-based applications?

  [ ] Are multiple users involved in data creation?

  [ ] Does the data involve real-time collaboration?

2. Data storage:

  [ ] Is the data stored in cloud repositories?

  [ ] Are there multiple storage locations for the same data?

  [ ] Does the storage system use encryption or other security measures?

3. Data sharing:

  [ ] Can the data be easily shared across platforms?

  [ ] Are there built-in sharing features within the application?

  [ ] Does sharing the data create new versions or copies?

4. Data format:

  [ ] Is the data in a non-traditional format (e.g., chat messages, video calls, live meetings)?

  [ ] Does the data format change when exported?

  [ ] Are there multiple data formats within a single source?

5. Data volatility:

  [ ] Does the data change (i.e., is it rewritten, revised, or commented on) regularly or often?

  [ ] Are there automatic deletion or archiving processes?

  [ ] Can users easily modify or delete the data?

6. Legal and compliance considerations:

  [ ] Are there specific regulations governing this data type?

  [ ] Is there established case law for this data source?

  [ ] Do licensing agreements restrict data export or use in legal proceedings?

Continue developing your awareness and habits around modern data

Today we’re grappling with AI. But tomorrow is bound to bring a new wave of technology with new eDiscovery considerations.

Keep using this checklist to inform how you approach new and challenging data. You can also check out our free eBook for more help defining modern data, recognizing it, and calibrating your approach when it comes your way.

And for more stories about how Lighthouse is helping clients protect and manage data, explore our information governance solutions.

About the Author

Daniel Black

As Executive Director of Digital Forensics, Daniel leads Lighthouse’s global digital forensics practice. The world-class team is responsible for data collection, investigation, and analysis using transparent, documented, and defensible workflows and methodologies. The team is comprised of more than 20 talented individuals with decades of combined experience across the collection, investigation, and analysis continuum, and hails from careers in security technology, software development, eDiscovery, law enforcement, and the military. This diversity in background and technical acumen, combined with a vast tech toolkit, enables Lighthouse to provide enterprise-grade remote and on-site data collection, forensic analysis, deposition prep and expert testimony, as well as support special use cases like risk management for employee onboarding and offboarding. 

Daniel brings more than 25 years of experience in the legal industry to Lighthouse and was most recently at Cisco where he led their eDiscovery and forensic investigations team for almost eleven years. The program he built saves Cisco over $50M a year. Prior to Cisco, Daniel was a freelance eDiscovery consultant, led Stratify’s global eDiscovery services team, and was a Litigation Support Manager at Heller Ehrman. 

Daniel has been a guest lecturer at Stanford Law School and was also featured in Inside Counsel magazine.